![]() 05/10/2015 at 18:39 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
An awesome MV Agusta F4 in Silver and Blue. I'm 16 and cannot the license :(. I've MVs are notoriously twitchy but handle and sound amazing.
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 05/10/2015 at 19:02 |
|
That’s weird, can you not get one before age 18 or something? And don’t worry, you’ll probably need that time to save up.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 19:13 |
|
My parents won't let me get my MB license as I only have my learners permit (I'll be getting my license with 2 months) and I only learned how to ride a bike when I was 10 and haven't ridden one since
![]() 05/10/2015 at 19:14 |
|
For cars.
Also, what I said about MVs, is that true?
![]() 05/10/2015 at 19:38 |
|
Well, no worries. I didn’t get my first streetbike/license until I was 20 anyway. And I haven’t ridden an F4 myself, but haven’t heard any complaints from the MV owners I know.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 19:44 |
|
This as a first bike would get you killed
![]() 05/10/2015 at 20:01 |
|
How much power does it have?
Would an F3 or a Honda CB600RR or Yamaha R6 be better?
![]() 05/10/2015 at 20:10 |
|
I don’t ride but I’ve always heard you want to start with a 250 (Ninja or CBR250) or a 500CC twin. These bikes are crazy fast and dangerous. They’ll out accelerate 99% of the machines on the road and the margin for error is slim.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 20:13 |
|
So a KTM RC 390 would be a good start?
![]() 05/10/2015 at 20:20 |
|
Like I said, I don’t ride so I’ll defer to the guys/girls with real world experience but yes it’s a far better starter bike than an F4. Only thing I’d watch out for are those fairings. They can actually be really expensive to fix if you lay it down or drop it.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 20:52 |
|
Those aren’t ideal but are better than a liter bike.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 21:00 |
|
I’m getting one as my first. So you should, too! They’re pretty light and quick enough to ride on the highway. Plus, they’re affordable and they look cool.
![]() 05/10/2015 at 21:28 |
|
I’ve also heard that Hayabusas are comparatively tame in comparison to other Liter bikes.
But I don’t want to be a squid.
But the ZX-14 I've heard is pretty chill too!
![]() 05/10/2015 at 21:32 |
|
What about this phenomena
KTMs I’ve heard have a sketchy reliability and had the “busted forks” controversy on the 250 Freeride and the SMC series
![]() 05/11/2015 at 07:17 |
|
If you are interested, Peter Black, SV Wrangler is our resident two wheels good expert. He has written a lot of stuff aimed at helping out beginners in the motorcycle world. I was going to link to some of his posts that might be helpful, but there are seriously a lot of them. Look through his post history, or at least read the second link.
http://kinja.com/peterblacksvwr…
http://oppositelock.jalopnik.com/what-makes-a-g…
![]() 05/25/2015 at 14:43 |
|
Yeah, sadly they’ve got a bit of a reputation for being temperamental.
Also, that is definitely a bike to work up to. I’ve been riding for 6 years now and -I- would be hesitant to take one of those out. My friend let me ride his 1299 Panigale and everything was incredibly more difficult than my Monster 1200.
I don’t know what you’re planning in regards to learning to ride, but if you have any questions let me know. I’ve helped a few friends get into riding and I can help you avoid some of the mistakes I made. If you do it right you’ll end up spending way less money and having way more fun.
![]() 05/25/2015 at 16:11 |
|
This’ll be a bit of a long one, just to warn you. Also, from here-on, when I refer to a “sportbike” I’m referring to bikes like the R6, R1, CBR’s, and GSXRs. There are a lot of “sportbikes” that are perfectly acceptable to learn on (KTM 390 is one, the 250’s, 300’s, and a few of the 500’s are good, too) TL;DR start with a “beginner” bike to be a much better rider and a much more alive person
Power alone is not what makes a bike bad to learn on. For sure, it can be a crutch; you can build up a lot of bad habits if you can just muscle out of corners, but it’s really a secondary concern. I’ve seen a lot of guys get a 600cc sportbike using this logic, and it doesn’t always end well.
But the main thing is suspension and steering geometry. Due to various aspects like rake angle (how close the forks are to vertical), trail(like caster for cars), and handlebar placement, a lot of the top-end sport bikes (and yes, 600’s are just as bad) have amazing handling IF you know what you’re doing, and I mean really know. The problem is that if you don’t, you’re going to have a bad time.
What typically makes a bike good for beginners is that it’s forgiving. If you go into a corner a little hot, or a little awkward with your body language, or you need to slow down a bit mid corner, or you’re not giving enough throttle to settle the rear, or you’re giving too much and lightening the front, or any of the myriad other ways to be off form on a bike, you can still get through the corner without much drama.
It’s easy to assume that a motorcycle is a lot like a car in that a high performance car drives just like a normal car, only faster and better through corners. There are a few cars that are a handful and require a gentle touch to avoid going tail first into the grass, but for the most part, you can put a new driver in a Cayman or M3 and as long as they don’t go too fast, they’ll be okay.
The problem is that a motorcycle is a much more dynamic thing than a car. You’re basically on a motor with wheels, being held up by gyroscopes, and you yourself weigh a third to a fourth as much as the vehicle itself. Additionally, a sportbike isn’t like a Cayman, or an M3, or even a high-dollar exotic. Even the 600cc bikes are more analagous to an open-wheel race car. They are quite literally designed to be as fast as is possible, with some concessions on power and component quality for price reasons. The result is that to hit that apex of performance the bike was designed for, you have to be very accurate with your body language and control inputs. If you shift your weight incorrectly going from one side to the other, you can induce headshake (oscillation of the front wheel) that can very easily throw you off the bike. You also need to keep in mind that a car can lose traction on one or more wheels and still keep going in basically the same direction. You don’t have that safety margin on a bike. So while most road cars require about the same amount of skill to drive at the same percentage of their limit, this is absolutely not true of road bikes.
Safety aside, there’s also the question of fun. For a new rider, I can almost guarantee you will have much more fun on a small, easier-to-ride bike.
There are a couple of reasons for this. For one, a 250cc twin (or KTM’s 390 single) is going to be a lot lighter than a 600cc or 1000cc I4. Similarly, because they make less power, they don’t need some stupidly huge rear tire to put that power down. Because a motorcycle turns using the shape of its tires, a narrower tire makes the bike feel much more agile. There are a lot of very experienced riders who still have 250cc class bikes because of how much fun they are on a properly twisty road.
The other part is that while a sportbike is stupidly quick on a track, they are miserable to ride around town. They’re uncomfortable as shit because of the ergonomics (that low-down riding position is going to make your back and/or your arms hurt like a motherfucker after an hour or so), and the way the handlebars are positioned, turning at low speed is like negotiating with a wolverine. As I mentioned in the other post, I rode my friend’s 1299 for ten minutes. In that ten minutes, my crotch was on fire from the exhaust that’s literally a half inch from the seat, my arms hurt, and I stalled it three times at stop signs because the engine will stall if you even look at it funny without giving it gas.
The last component in my little trifecta is skill. Because of the twitchy, uncooperative handling dynamics of the average sportbike, a lot of the guys who get one for their first bike are TERRIBLE riders. They’re so unsteady on the bike that they mosey through corners, power out, and think they’re the fastest shit on earth.
As an anecdote, the other day I was riding with some friends through a local canyon. I was on my Monster, my friend was on the -most- ghetto Triumph Daytona 675 you’ve ever seen (his shifter is a 3/4” bolt), and we were behind a guy on a sportbike of some type (It’s not easy to tell from behind.) Daytona had a passenger who had never been on a motorcycle before, so he was taking it easy, and even still this guy on the sportbike was slowing us down. While we were looking for a chance to pass him, he decided he’d show us just how fast he was. He made it through about two corners (still going pretty slow) and then went into the third way too hot, froze up, and ABS’d all the way into a gravel parking lot that was VERY conveniently there.
A good rider on a slow bike can very easily smoke a poor rider on a fast bike. I’m far from what you’d call a skilled rider, but I’ve still managed to scrape my toes, knees, and kickstand on my previous, fully-loaded adventure bike on aggressive off-road tires.
Confidence born of a stable, predictable bike, and light-and-responsive inputs go a LONG way to being fast through corners and, more importantly, to building up those skills to go even faster. It’s hard to be willing to try something new, like shifting your weight off the seat, if you’re worried that you might go down for your impertinence.
Additionally, because sportbikes are tuned to have as much power as they can without requiring expensive engines or exploding all the time, all of their power is in the top end. That’s great if you’re on a track and revving to 10-16krpm all day, but in everyday riding, that means that the bike is fairly sluggish right up until you hit a somewhat-unpredictable wall of power.
If you start on a smaller bike, ride that for a year or two, and then move up to something more hardcore like the F4, F3, or the japanese 600’s or liter bikes, you’ll be a far better rider for it. The other advantage is used 250’s basically don’t depreciate. A lot of people sell them a few years later and MAKE money.
So, the question then is, what bike should you start on?
That’s more or less up to you.
The basic things you should look for are:
1. Something that isn’t the range-topper for that category. There are a lot of differences between say, a Ninja 650 and a Ninja 600, despite looking similar and only being 50cc apart in displacement. And yes, the 600 is faster.
Comfortable and fun vs. you gon’ die.
2. A 2-or-3-cylinder engine of some configuration. Twins generally have more torque and a much more usable powerband than inline fours. Although they’re more expensive, Triples are god’s gift to motorcycling. You get the best of both worlds; the torque and smooth powerband of a twin, the sky-high redline and smooth power of a four, all wrapped around a glorious sound. Notable Triples are Triumphs and the MV Brutale.
3. Handlebars that aren’t clipped onto the forks. An actual metal tube will give you the easiest time of things, generally, but the single hand grips that are risen above the top of the forks are good, too. Having handlebars that are very low and very narrow is a lot of what makes muscling a sportbike around at low speed such a chore.
I started with a Suzuki Gladius, which was basically the legendary SV 650, just uglier. The 250 and 300 sportbikes are always popular, as are the KTM 390s recently. While the low-displacement bikes struggle a bit at highway speeds at times, their light weight and nimble handling will make things so much more fun for you.
I’m not trying to scare you off of motorcycles or even sportbikes, I’m just trying to make it very clear why it’s a better idea to start off on something that will allow you to learn instead of spending the entire time trying to avoid dying. Especially here, on a forum of car enthusiasts, I find it’s easy for people to fall into the “I can drive fast cars no problem, so a fast bike will be fine” mentality.
![]() 05/25/2015 at 16:33 |
|
Just gonna leave this here.
And this .
And this .
And this , which is a guide to what makes for a good starter bike.
Seriously, just read all of Pete’s posts. They’re pretty informative.
![]() 05/25/2015 at 21:28 |
|
....ummm. dude. HELL> FUCKING. NO. YOU WANNA DIE?!?!
realize that a something like that will keep up with a VEYRON in a mile race and you want it as a STARTER bike?!?!?!?!
Jesus....
![]() 05/25/2015 at 22:45 |
|
ITS THAT FAST???
![]() 05/26/2015 at 08:40 |
|
yea.
grtanted, this is a S1000RR, which is a bit quicker, but it will still worry a monster like the veyron